From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TAP output format in pg_regress |
Date: | 2022-07-04 20:13:52 |
Message-ID: | 20220704201352.yex6b2t7o5vx2jgq@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-06-29 21:50:45 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> @@ -279,8 +648,7 @@ stop_postmaster(void)
> r = system(buf);
> if (r != 0)
> {
> - fprintf(stderr, _("\n%s: could not stop postmaster: exit code was %d\n"),
> - progname, r);
> + pg_log_error("could not stop postmaster: exit code was %d", r);
> _exit(2); /* not exit(), that could be recursive */
> }
There's a lot of stuff like this. Perhaps worth doing separately? I'm not sure
I unerstand where you used bail and where not. I assume it's mostly arund use
uf _exit() vs exit()?
> + test_status_ok(tests[i]);
>
> if (statuses[i] != 0)
> log_child_failure(statuses[i]);
>
> INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(stoptimes[i], starttimes[i]);
> - status(_(" %8.0f ms"), INSTR_TIME_GET_MILLISEC(stoptimes[i]));
> + runtime(tests[i], INSTR_TIME_GET_MILLISEC(stoptimes[i]));
Based on the discussion downthread, let's just always compute this and display
it even in the tap format?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kenaniah Cerny | 2022-07-04 20:17:00 | Re: Proposal: allow database-specific role memberships |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-07-04 20:06:17 | Re: TAP output format in pg_regress |