Re: pg_checkpointer is not a verb or verb phrase

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_checkpointer is not a verb or verb phrase
Date: 2022-07-01 21:50:54
Message-ID: 20220701215054.GA624634@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> +1 for pg_checkpoint on that -- let's not make it longer than necessary.
>
> And yes, +1 for actually changing it. It's a lot cheaper to change it now
> than it will be in the future. Yes, it would've been even cheaper to have
> already changed it, but we can't go back in time...

Yeah, pg_checkpoint seems like the obvious alternative to pg_checkpointer.
I didn't see a patch in this thread yet, so I've put one together. I did
not include the catversion bump.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Rename-pg_checkpointer-to-pg_checkpoint.patch text/x-diff 5.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-07-01 21:52:33 Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-07-01 21:36:46 Re: refactor some protocol message sending in walsender and basebackup