Re: "buffer too small" or "path too long"?

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "buffer too small" or "path too long"?
Date: 2022-06-14 00:52:52
Message-ID: 20220614.095252.1151623170938487277.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:48:26 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> At Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:25:01 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in
> > +1, but I'm inclined to make it read "... is too long".
>
> Yeah, I feel so and it is what I wondered about recently when I saw
> some complete error messages. Is that because of the length of the
> subject?

And I found that it is alrady done. Thanks!

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-06-14 01:06:01 Re: Collation version tracking for macOS
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-06-14 00:48:26 Re: "buffer too small" or "path too long"?