From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson |
Date: | 2022-06-02 21:13:33 |
Message-ID: | 20220602211333.op5mz2z2txqhuxsn@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-06-02 15:53:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Oh. I executed maintainer-clean inside src/backend/parser/, and thus didn't
> > see it getting cleaned up.
>
> > It seems pretty darn grotty that src/backend/parser/Makefile explicitly states
> > that gram.c ... aren't cleaned "here", but then src/backend/Makefile does
> > clean them up.
>
> I agree the factorization of this ain't great. I'd think about improving
> it, were it not that we're trying to get rid of it.
+1. I think I just wanted to excuse my confusion...
> (But with meson, the whole idea of building or cleaning just part of the
> tree is out the window anyway, no?)
Cleaning parts of the tree isn't supported as far as I know (not that I've
needed it). You can build parts of the tree by specifying the target
(e.g. ninja src/backend/postgres) or by specifying meta-targets (e.g. ninja
contrib backend). I've thought about contributing a patch to meson to
automatically generate targets for each directory that has sub-targets - it's
just a few lines.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-06-02 21:17:34 | Re: pg_upgrade test writes to source directory |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-06-02 21:06:18 | Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option |