Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test
Date: 2022-06-02 16:48:25
Message-ID: 20220602164825.zlzey36pmpbgjvqb@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-06-01 13:59:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 01:58:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Why don't you just use src/interfaces/ instead of adding a direct
> > path to libpq?
>
> So, this leads to something like the attached. Does that sound fine
> to you?

That looks reasonable to me. Do you want to apply it or will you?

Regards,

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-06-02 17:08:49 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-06-02 16:47:22 Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test