Re: support for MERGE

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Westermann <dwe(at)dbi-services(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: support for MERGE
Date: 2022-06-01 11:03:17
Message-ID: 20220601110317.GC29853@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 12:56:55PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 31.05.22 22:06, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:57:15AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > I prefer my original, but the most important thing is to include the link at
> > > *somewhere*.
> >
> > Any other opinions ?
>
> Álvaro's patch seems ok to me. What are you concerned about? Do you have
> an alternative suggestion? It's a bit hard to figure out the specifics of
> what everyone is thinking.

My original suggestion was here
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220511163350.GL19626%40telsasoft.com

I prefer that way, with "See also" after the text that requires more
information. But the most important thing is to include the link at all.

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-06-01 12:10:58 Re: funcs.sgml - wrong example
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-06-01 10:56:55 Re: support for MERGE