| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Петър Славов <pet(dot)slavov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2022-05-31 18:54:05 |
| Message-ID: | 202205311854.25lm54rtkg2y@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2022-May-31, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:42 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > Hmm ... Exactly what code is being tested here? I see in one of these
> > backtraces that there is a reference to a function called
> > heap_prune_from_root, but I can't find that in the Postgres sources.
>
> This includes a patch from me, to make pruning more robust. It could
> technically be a bug in my patch, though a bug revealed by my patch
> seems quite possible too.
Ah, I see. Well, the explanation that depends on Xmin doesn't apply to
this case. I'm not saying there are no bugs in the other two commits,
just that such bug(s) have a different explanation, so it makes sense to
revert separately.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La rebeldía es la virtud original del hombre" (Arthur Schopenhauer)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-05-31 19:09:04 | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Previous Message | Honza Horak | 2022-05-31 18:47:18 | Re: PostgreSQL 14.3 plpython not compatible with Python 3.11 |