Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, myon(at)debian(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats
Date: 2022-05-20 03:59:28
Message-ID: 20220520035928.c5k267fgsxhtpbnt@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-05-19 22:58:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> What I am wondering about at this point is whether the effects of
> pg_stat_force_next_flush() could somehow be delayed until after we
> have told the client the command is complete.

It shouldn't - it just forces pg_stat_report_stat() to flush (rather than
doing so based on the time of the last report). And pg_stat_report_stat()
happens before ReadyForQuery().

Hm. Does the instability vanish if you switch s2_commit_prepared_a and s1_ff?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-05-20 04:12:09 Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-05-20 03:58:29 Re: Build-farm - intermittent error in 031_column_list.pl