| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats |
| Date: | 2022-05-20 03:47:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20220520034727.u7wjnrcskdscw5sx@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-05-19 21:42:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > seq_scan|seq_tup_read|n_tup_ins|n_tup_upd|n_tup_del|n_live_tup|n_dead_tup|vacuum_count
> > --------+------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+----------+------------
> > - 3| 9| 5| 1| 0| 1| 1| 0
> > + 3| 9| 5| 1| 0| 4| 1| 0
> > (1 row)
> Even more interesting, the repeatability varies with the settings
> of max_connections and max_prepared_transactions.
That is indeed quite odd.
> At low values (resp. 20 and 0) I've not been able to make it happen at all,
> but at 100 and 2 it happens circa three times out of four.
Is this the only permutation that fails?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-05-20 03:58:24 | Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-05-20 03:06:16 | Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations |