Re: mylodon's failures in the back branches

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mylodon's failures in the back branches
Date: 2022-05-03 04:42:44
Message-ID: 20220503044244.bujzmhz5wkihekty@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-05-03 00:24:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2022-05-02 23:18:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Seems easiest to just change the configuration so that ICU isn't enabled for
> > 10, 11? It's pretty reasonable to rely on it these days...
>
> Yeah, that seemed like the most plausible answer to me too. The point
> of the animal is to check C90 compatibility, not ICU compatibility.

Did that now - didn't suffice. Disabling libxml seems to do the trick though -
might still be ICU, just indirectly pulled in...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-05-03 04:57:07 Re: strange slow query - lost lot of time somewhere
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-05-03 04:24:09 Re: mylodon's failures in the back branches