| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
| Date: | 2022-04-22 18:36:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20220422183656.3ib5bkxthwuygz26@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-04-21 09:42:44 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2022-04-21 Th 00:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:56:17PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> Basically I propose just to remove any mention of the Testlib items and
> >> get_free_port from the export and alias lists for versions where they
> >> are absent. If backpatchers need a function they can backport it if
> >> necessary.
> > Agreed. I am fine to stick to that (I may have done that only once or
> > twice in the past years, so that does not happen a lot either IMO).
> > The patch in itself looks like an improvement in the right direction,
> > so +1 from me.
> Thanks, pushed.
Thanks for working on this!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-04-22 19:54:34 | Re: Building Postgres with lz4 on Visual Studio |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-22 17:44:40 | Re: Why is EXECUTE granted to PUBLIC for all routines? |