From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash |
Date: | 2022-04-18 18:23:36 |
Message-ID: | 20220418182336.GA2298576@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 04:48:35PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Saying that, it would be nice to see durable_rename_excl() gone as it
> has created quite a bit of pain for us in the past years.
Yeah, I think this is the right thing to do. Patch upthread [0].
For back-branches, I suspect we'll want to remove all uses of
durable_rename_excl() but leave the function around for any extensions that
are using it. Of course, we'd also need a big comment imploring folks not
to add any more callers. Another option would be to change the behavior of
durable_rename_excl() to something that we think is safer (e.g., stat then
rename), but that might just introduce a different set of problems.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/20220408194345.GA1541826%40nathanxps13
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-18 18:53:41 | Re: Fix NULL pointer reference in _outPathTarget() |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-18 18:07:43 | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |