| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
| Date: | 2022-04-18 14:15:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20220418141530.nfxtkohefvwnzncl@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2021-10-25 17:12:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:46:30AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > ... and pushed.
>
> Thanks!
I just, again, tried to backport a test as part of a bugfix. The
renaming between 14 and 15 makes that task almost comically harder. The
only way I see of dealing with that for the next 5 years is to just
never backpatch tests to < 15. Which seems like a bad outcome.
I just read through the thread and didn't really see this aspect
discussed - which I find surprising.
Except that it's *way* too late I would argue that this should just
straight up be reverted until that aspect is addressed. It's a
maintenance nightmare.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-18 14:26:15 | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2022-04-18 14:11:22 | Re: A qsort template |