Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser

At Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:55:48 +0900, Shinya Kato <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
> I understand. For backward compatibility, I left the ROLE clause
> option as it is and changed the IN ROLE clause option to --membership
> option.

Thanks!

- printf(_(" -g, --role=ROLE new role will be a member of this role\n"));
+ printf(_(" -g, --role=ROLE new role will be a member of this role\n"));

This looks lik an unexpected change. We shoudl preserve it, but *I*
think that we can add a synonym of the old --role for
understandability/memorability. (By the way "-g" looks like coming
from "group", which looks somewhat strange..)

> printf(_(" -b, --belongs-to=ROLE new role will be a member of this role\n"));

+ printf(_(" -m, --membership=ROLE this role will be a member of new role\n"));

membership sounds somewhat obscure, it seems *to me* members is clearer

> printf(_(" -m, --member=ROLE new role will be a member of this role\n"));

I'd like to hear others' opinions.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center