Re: API stability

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: API stability
Date: 2022-04-06 06:31:53
Message-ID: 20220406.153153.746094489184530420.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

At Wed, 06 Apr 2022 14:30:37 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> So if we don't want to move any member in PGPROC, we do:
>
> 14: after statusFlags.
> 13: after delayChkpt.
> 12-10: after syncRepState (and before syncRepLinks).
>
> If we allow to shift some members, the new flag can be placed more
> saner place.
>
> 14: after delayChkpt ((uint8)statusFlags moves forward by 1 byte)
> 13: after delayChkpt (no member moves)
> 12-10: after subxids ((bool)procArrayGroupMember moves forward by 1 byte)
>
> I continue working on the last direction above.

Hmm. That is ABI break. I go with the first way.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2022-04-06 06:52:37 pgsql: Allow asynchronous execution in more cases.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-04-06 06:18:55 pgsql: Update Unicode data to CLDR 41

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-04-06 06:53:32 Re: API stability
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-04-06 05:58:29 Re: Logical replication timeout problem