| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: JSON constructors and window functions |
| Date: | 2022-04-04 16:33:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20220404163352.hmbd6isaxltlgu4d@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-04-04 11:54:23 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Are we missing regression tests using these functions as window functions?
So far, yes.
ISTM that 4eb97988796 should have at least included the crashing statement as
a test... The statement can be simpler too:
SELECT json_objectagg(k : v with unique keys) OVER (ORDER BY k) FROM (VALUES (1,1), (2,2)) a(k,v);
is sufficient to trigger the crash for me, without even using asan (after
reverting the bugfix, of course).
> Hm. I suppose it's possible to write a general purpose regression test
> that loops over all aggregate functions and runs them as window
> functions and aggregates over the same data sets and compares results.
> At least for the case of aggregate functions with a single parameter
> belonging to a chosen set of data types.
I was wondering about that too. Hardest part would be to come up with values
to pass to the aggregates.
I don't think it'd help in this case though, since it depends on special case
grammar stuff to even be reached. json_objectagg(k : v with unique
keys). "Normal" use of aggregates can't even reach the problematic path
afaics.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-04 16:39:53 | Re: Pluggable toaster |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2022-04-04 16:31:41 | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |