Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)
Date: 2022-04-04 08:54:49
Message-ID: 20220404.175449.837744764428020019.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 04 Apr 2022 17:29:48 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> I haven't found how the patch caused creation of a relation file that
> is to be removed soon. However, I find that v19 patch fails by maybe
> due to some change in Cluster.pm. It takes a bit more time to check
> that..

I was a bit away, of course the wal-logged create database interfares
with the patch here. But I haven't found that why it stops creating
database directory under pg_tblspc.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2022-04-04 09:18:08 Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Previous Message Daniel Shelepanov 2022-04-04 08:51:10 collect_corrupt_items_vacuum.patch