From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson -v8 |
Date: | 2022-03-28 19:59:13 |
Message-ID: | 20220328195913.rz3bllzhr26innoi@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-03-25 10:01:09 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 22.03.22 03:22, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Attached is v8. It's just a rebase to resolve conflicts with recent changes.
>
> I have committed the DLSUFFIX refactoring, and also a stripped-down version
> of the patch that makes update-unicode work with vpath. This takes care of
> patches 0007 and 0009.
Thanks!
> The only other thing IMO that might be worth addressing in PG15 is the
> snowball scripts refactoring (0002 and 0003), but that doesn't seem quite
> ready yet. (At least, it would need to be integrated into the distprep
> target, since it adds a dependency on perl.) Maybe it's not worth it right
> now.
Not sure myself.
> With that, I suggest moving this patch set to CF 2022-07.
Done.
One thing I'd like to discuss fairly soon is what kind of approach to take for
integrating meson support. Most other projects I looked kept parallel
buildsystems for at least a release, so that there's one round of "broad" user
feedback.
In our context it could make sense to merge meson, after a few months of
shakeup remove the current windows buildsystems, and then in release + 1
remove the make based stuff.
But we can have that discussion that before the next CF, but still after
code-freeze & immediate mopup.
> A general comment on the remaining prereq patches: We appear to be
> accumulating a mix of conventions for how "generate" scripts specify their
> output file. Some have it built-in, some use the last argument, some use an
> option, which might be -o or --output. Maybe we can gently work toward more
> commonality there.
Fair point.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2022-03-28 20:03:33 | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-28 19:56:18 | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles |