| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ubsan |
| Date: | 2022-03-23 20:12:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20220323201234.nyh2uzot3t6becr5@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-03-23 15:58:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I think we should backpatch both, based on the reasoning in
> > 46ab07ffda9d6c8e63360ded2d4568aa160a7700 ?
>
> Yeah, I suppose. Is anyone going to step up and run a buildfarm
> member with ubsan enabled? (I'm already checking -fsanitize=alignment
> on longfin, but it seems advisable to keep that separate from
> -fsanitize=undefined.)
I'm planning to enable it on two of mine. Looks like gcc and clang find
slightly different things, so I was intending to enable it on one of each.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-03-23 20:23:58 | Re: SQL/JSON: functions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-03-23 19:59:10 | Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks |