From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: add checkpoint stats of snapshot and mapping files of pg_logical dir |
Date: | 2022-03-21 18:50:05 |
Message-ID: | 20220321185005.b4gkwtcm5pjr3cvg@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-03-21 11:27:15 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 4:39 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > before we further change this (as done in this patch) we should deduplicate
> > these huge statements in a separate patch / commit.
>
> Something like attached
> v6-0001-Deduplicate-checkpoint-restartpoint-complete-mess.patch?
Mostly. I don't see a reason for the use of the stringinfo. And I think
LogCheckpointStart() should be dealt with similarly.
I'd just make it a restartpoint ? _("restartpoint") : _("checkpoint") or such
in the argument? Then translators don't need to translate the two messages
separately.
Or we could just not translate restartpoint/checkpoint - after all we don't
translate the flags in LogCheckpointStart() either. But on balance I'd lean
towards the above.
> > This practically doubles the size of the log message - doesn't that seem a bit
> > disproportionate? Can we make this more dense? "logical decoding rewrite
> > mapping file(s) removed=" and "logical decoding snapshot file(s) removed=" is
> > quite long.
>
> Do you suggest something like below? Or some other better wording like
> "logical decoding rewrite map files" and "logical decoding snapshot
> files" or "logical rewrite map files" and "logical snapshot files" or
> just "rewrite mapping files" or "snapshot files" .... ?
Both seem still very long. I still am doubtful this level of detail is
appropriate. Seems more like a thing for a tracepoint or such. How about just
printing the time for the logical decoding operations in aggregate, without
breaking down into files, adding LSNs etc?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-03-21 19:03:07 | Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-03-21 18:43:52 | Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) |