Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces
Date: 2022-03-08 03:01:03
Message-ID: 20220308.120103.515204097583311458.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:28:46 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:06:50AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:39:06 +1300, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> >> Thanks, you're right. Test on a Win10 VM. Here's a new version.
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> > FYI, on Windows11, pg_basebackup didn't work correctly without the
> > patch. So this looks like fixing an undiscovered bug as well.
>
> Well, that's not really a long-time bug but just a side effect of
> in-place tablespaces because we don't use them in many test cases
> yet, is it?

No, we don't. So just FYI.

> >> pg_basebackup -D copy
> > WARNING: could not read symbolic link "pg_tblspc/16384": Invalid argument
> > pg_basebackup: error: tar member has empty name
> >
> > 1 File(s) 0 bytes
> > 3 Dir(s) 171,920,613,376 bytes free
>
> That's a lot of free space.

The laptop has a 512GB storage, so 160GB is pretty normal, maybe.
129GB of the storage is used by some VMs..

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-03-08 03:08:01 Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-08 02:57:17 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson