| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements |
| Date: | 2022-03-07 13:01:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20220307130108.qrliztwcz6pgscd2@ddolgov.remote.csb |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 01:27:02PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 5:40 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > One interesting not-very-relevant for the patch thing I've noticed while
> > reading it, is that there seems to be no way to find out what fraction
> > of time jit_tuple_deforming is taking alone, it's sort of merged
> > together with jit_expressions in generation_counter.
>
> That's missing att a deeper level though, right? We don't have it in
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE either. So while I agree that's useful, I think that's
> the job of another patch, and these two sets of counters should be the
> same.
Right, it's missing on the instrumentation level, I was just surprised
to notice that.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-03-07 13:09:22 | Re: Add parameter jit_warn_above_fraction |
| Previous Message | Ajin Cherian | 2022-03-07 12:44:14 | Re: logical replication empty transactions |