| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Interesting fail when migrating Pg from Ubuntu Bionic to Focal |
| Date: | 2022-03-04 20:45:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20220304204510.GA21340@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-pkg-debian |
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 02:09:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> arm64, eh? I wonder if that's buggier than the Intel code paths.
>
> I tried and failed to reproduce this on Fedora 35 on aarch64,
> but that has what I think is a newer LLVM version:
I have suspicion that it also kinda depends on number of rows in there.
When I deleted some schemas, which included some functions, the problem
disappeared.
I wasn't able to pinpoint specific thing, though, and when I called the
pg_proc + pg_roles query for each separate row - it worked flawlessly.
Best regards,
depesz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-04 22:03:14 | Re: Interesting fail when migrating Pg from Ubuntu Bionic to Focal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-04 19:09:52 | Re: Interesting fail when migrating Pg from Ubuntu Bionic to Focal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-04 22:03:14 | Re: Interesting fail when migrating Pg from Ubuntu Bionic to Focal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-04 19:09:52 | Re: Interesting fail when migrating Pg from Ubuntu Bionic to Focal |