Re: casting operand to proper type in BlockIdGetBlockNumber

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: casting operand to proper type in BlockIdGetBlockNumber
Date: 2022-03-03 17:50:22
Message-ID: 20220303175022.ljjsx2kwh4r3wh57@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-03-03 12:45:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2022-03-03 12:13:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hmph. I tried enabling -fsanitize=undefined here, and I get some
> >> complaints about passing null pointers to memcmp and the like, but
> >> nothing about this shift (tested with clang 12.0.1 on RHEL8 as well
> >> as clang 13.0.0 on Fedora 35).
>
> > We should fix these passing-null-pointer cases...
>
> Yeah, working on that now. But I'm pretty confused about why I can't
> duplicate this shift complaint. Alma is a Red Hat clone no? Why
> doesn't its compiler act the same as RHEL8's?

I didn't see that either. It could be a question of building with full
optimizations / asserts vs without?

> > Need to manually add -ldl, because -fsanitize breaks our dl test (it uses
> > dlopen, but not dlsym). Was planning to submit a fix for that...
>
> Hmm ... didn't get through check-world yet, but I don't see that
> so far.

Oh, for me it doesn't even build. Perhaps one of the dependencies injects it
as well?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2022-03-03 17:52:58 Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-03 17:45:22 Re: casting operand to proper type in BlockIdGetBlockNumber