From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | andres(at)anarazel(dot)de |
Cc: | ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |
Date: | 2022-03-03 08:04:12 |
Message-ID: | 20220303.170412.1542007127371857370.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:16:00 -0800, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote in
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-07-26 18:27:54 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I had intended to post a rebase by now. But while I did mostly finish
> > that (see [1]) I unfortunately encountered a new issue around
> > partitioned tables, see [2]. Currently I'm hoping for a few thoughts on
> > that thread about the best way to address the issues.
>
> Now that https://postgr.es/m/20220125063131.4cmvsxbz2tdg6g65%40alap3.anarazel.de
> is resolved, here's a rebased version. With a good bit of further cleanup.
>
> One "big" thing that I'd like to figure out is a naming policy for the
> different types prefixed with PgStat. We have different groups of types:
>
> - "pending statistics", that are accumulated but not yet submitted to the
> shared stats system, like PgStat_TableStatus, PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry
> etc
> - accumulated statistics like PgStat_StatDBEntry, PgStat_SLRUStats. About half are
> prefixed with PgStat_Stat, the other just with PgStat_
> - random other types like PgStat_Single_Reset_Type, ...
>
> To me it's very confusing to have these all in an essentially undistinguishing
> namespace, particularly the top two items.
Profoundly agreed. It was always a pain in the neck.
> I think we should at least do s/PgStat_Stat/PgStat_/. Perhaps we should use a
> distinct PgStatPending_* for the pending item? I can't quite come up with a
> good name for the "accumulated" ones.
How about naming "pending stats" as just "Stats" and the "acculumated
stats" as "counts" or "counters"? "Counter" doesn't reflect the
characteristics so exactly but I think the discriminability of the two
is more significant. Specifically;
- PgStat_TableStatus
+ PgStat_TableStats
- PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry
+ PgStat_FunctionStats
- PgStat_GlobalStats
+ PgStat_GlobalCounts
- PgStat_ArchiverStats
+ PgStat_ArchiverCounts
- PgStat_BgWriterStats
+ PgStat_BgWriterCounts
Moving to shared stats collector turns them into attributed by "Local"
and "Shared". (I don't consider the details at this stage.)
PgStatLocal_TableStats
PgStatLocal_FunctionStats
PgStatLocal_GlobalCounts
PgStatLocal_ArchiverCounts
PgStatLocal_BgWriterCounts
PgStatShared_TableStats
PgStatShared_FunctionStats
PgStatShared_GlobalCounts
PgStatShared_ArchiverCounts
PgStatShared_BgWriterCounts
PgStatLocal_GlobalCounts somewhat looks odd, but doesn't matter much, maybe.
> I'd like that get resolved first because I think that'd allow commiting the
> prepatory split and reordering patches.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-03-03 08:41:22 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-03-03 07:45:33 | Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers |