Re: Adding CI to our tree

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: 2022-02-27 02:50:00
Message-ID: 20220227025000.mjmfimls5gnz7em7@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-02-26 20:43:52 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> This doesn't do the right thing - I just tried.
> https://cirrus-ci.org/guide/writing-tasks/#environment-variables
> | changesInclude function can be very useful for skipping some tasks when no changes to sources have been made since the last successful Cirrus CI build.

> That means it will not normally rebuild docs (and then this still requires
> resolving the "base branch").

Why would we want to rebuild docs if they're the same as in the last build for
the same branch? For cfbot purposes each commit is independent from the prior
commit, so it should rebuild it every time if the CF entry has changes to the
docs.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-02-27 03:10:57 Re: Adding CI to our tree
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2022-02-27 02:43:52 Re: Adding CI to our tree