Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations
Date: 2022-02-18 22:11:45
Message-ID: 20220218221145.rudknc5v5nbeeguo@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-02-18 15:54:19 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Are there any objections to this plan?
>
> I really like the idea of reducing the scope of what is being changed
> here, and I agree that eagerly advancing relfrozenxid carries much
> less risk than the other changes.

Sounds good to me too!

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-02-18 22:18:21 Re: Emit a warning if the extension's GUC is set incorrectly
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-02-18 22:11:17 Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations