From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs) |
Date: | 2022-02-17 17:27:24 |
Message-ID: | 20220217172724.uhs2v3mgio7y6ga5@jrouhaud |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:39:02PM +0530, Nitin Jadhav wrote:
> > > Thank you for sharing the information. 'triggering backend PID' (int)
> > > - can be stored without any problem.
> >
> > There can be multiple processes triggering a checkpoint, or at least wanting it
> > to happen or happen faster.
>
> Yes. There can be multiple processes but there will be one checkpoint
> operation at a time. So the backend PID corresponds to the current
> checkpoint operation. Let me know if I am missing something.
If there's a checkpoint timed triggered and then someone calls
pg_start_backup() which then wait for the end of the current checkpoint
(possibly after changing the flags), I think the view should reflect that in
some way. Maybe storing an array of (pid, flags) is too much, but at least a
counter with the number of processes actively waiting for the end of the
checkpoint.
> > > 'checkpoint or restartpoint?'
> >
> > Do you actually need to store that? Can't it be inferred from
> > pg_is_in_recovery()?
>
> AFAIK we cannot use pg_is_in_recovery() to predict whether it is a
> checkpoint or restartpoint because if the system exits from recovery
> mode during restartpoint then any query to pg_stat_progress_checkpoint
> view will return it as a checkpoint which is ideally not correct. Please
> correct me if I am wrong.
Recovery ends with an end-of-recovery checkpoint that has to finish before the
promotion can happen, so I don't think that a restart can still be in progress
if pg_is_in_recovery() returns false.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2022-02-17 17:29:15 | Re: [PATCH] Accept IP addresses in server certificate SANs |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-17 17:12:09 | Re: killing perl2host |