From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | andres(at)anarazel(dot)de |
Cc: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Race conditions in 019_replslot_limit.pl |
Date: | 2022-02-16 06:01:19 |
Message-ID: | 20220216.150119.226485024172638507.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:26:37 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Agreed. Doing this att all slot creation seems fine.
Done in the attached. The first slot is deliberately created
unreserved so I changed the code to re-create the slot with "reserved"
before taking backup.
> > Even though the node has log_disconnect = true, and other processes indeed log
> > their disconnection, there's no disconnect for the above session until the
> > server is shut down. Even though pg_basebackup clearly finished? Uh, huh?
>
> It seems to me so, too.
>
> > I guess it's conceivable that the backend was still working through process
> > shutdown? But it doesn't seem too likely, given that several other connections
> > manage to get through entire connect / disconnect cycles?
>
> Yes, but since postmaster seems thinking that process is gone.
s/ since//;
Whatever is happening at that time, I can make sure that walsender is
gone before making a new replication connection, even though it
doesn't "fix" any of the observed issues.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-02-16 06:09:38 | Re: Race conditions in 019_replslot_limit.pl |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-02-16 05:58:23 | Re: Race conditions in 019_replslot_limit.pl |