Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2022-02-13 02:02:55
Message-ID: 20220213020255.vjcamllo47xo2w4e@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-02-11 13:47:01 +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Today I noticed the inefficiencies of our dead tuple storage once
> again, and started theorizing about a better storage method; which is
> when I remembered that this thread exists, and that this thread
> already has amazing results.
>
> Are there any plans to get the results of this thread from PoC to committable?

I'm not currently planning to work on it personally. It'd would be awesome if
somebody did...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Koshakow 2022-02-13 02:16:05 Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-02-13 02:00:44 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints