| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17355: Server crashes on ExecReScanForeignScan in postgres_fdw when accessing foreign partition |
| Date: | 2022-02-06 15:00:50 |
| Message-ID: | 202202061500.ocwvfbkylw3g@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2022-Feb-03, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > Maybe you don't need to add the test in back-branches, which is more
> > work; but if you only target branch master, it should only require an
> > ISOLATION line in the Makefile listing the new test.
>
> I think it would be better to create a separate patch so that we test
> not only this but other EvalPlanQual stuff such as ForeignRecheck, so
> I applied the proposed patch to HEAD as well.
Sure, that sounds good. Are you or is anybody else working on that?
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost.
(Lincoln Yeoh)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Koval | 2022-02-06 21:21:39 | Re: BUG #17385: "RESET transaction_isolation" inside serializable transaction causes Assert at the transaction end |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2022-02-06 08:29:24 | Re: BUG #17385: "RESET transaction_isolation" inside serializable transaction causes Assert at the transaction end |