From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication |
Date: | 2022-02-05 12:25:09 |
Message-ID: | 202202051225.i6ouuux6r5di@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Feb-05, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:06 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't have a reason not to commit this patch.
> >
>
> It is not very clear to me from this so just checking again, are you
> fine with back-patching this as well?
Hmm, of course, I never thought it'd be a good idea to let the bug
unfixed in back branches.
Thanks!
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El sudor es la mejor cura para un pensamiento enfermo" (Bardia)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2022-02-05 13:32:40 | Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not? |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-02-05 11:50:50 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |