| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: pg_walfile_name uses XLByteToPrevSeg | 
| Date: | 2022-02-04 22:50:57 | 
| Message-ID: | 20220204225057.GA1535307@nathanxps13 | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:17:54AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> And it gives some surprising results as well
>> ---
>> #select pg_walfile_name('0/0'::pg_lsn);
>>      pg_walfile_name
>> --------------------------
>>  00000001FFFFFFFF000000FF
>> (1 row)
>> ----
> 
> Yeah, that seems wrong.
It looks like it's been this way for a while (704ddaa).
pg_walfile_name_offset() has the following comment:
 * Note that a location exactly at a segment boundary is taken to be in
 * the previous segment.  This is usually the right thing, since the
 * expected usage is to determine which xlog file(s) are ready to archive.
I see a couple of discussions about this as well [0] [1].
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1154384790.3226.21.camel%40localhost.localdomain
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/15952.1154827205%40sss.pgh.pa.us
-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2022-02-04 22:56:45 | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? | 
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-02-04 22:26:46 | Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations |