From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
Date: | 2022-01-27 22:59:26 |
Message-ID: | 20220127225926.dheegxfitrkvtufw@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-01-27 14:36:32 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On my windows test instance where I noticed this (w10,
> > msys2/ucrt), check took 516s and this test took 685s.
>
> Hm. That's both excruciatingly slow. Way way slower than what I see here, also
> w10, msys2/ucrt. Any chance the test instance has windows defender running,
> without a directory exclusion? I saw that trash performance to a near
> standstill.
Could you post the regression test output with the timings? Unless it's AV, I
don't see why a windows VM with a moderate amount of memory should take that
long.
Do the test times get less bad if you use PG_TEST_USE_UNIX_SOCKETS=1
PG_REGRESS_SOCK_DIR: "c:/some-dir/"?
I see there's reports that the connection-timeout problem can be a lot worse
on windows, because several applications, e.g. docker, add additional names
for localhost. Are there any non-commented entries in
C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts
> Does it get better with the attached patch?
I pushed something like it now - seemed to be no reason to wait, given it
makes think less slow on my VM.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-01-27 23:03:57 | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-01-27 22:53:02 | Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig |