Re: PSA: Autoconf has risen from the dead

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PSA: Autoconf has risen from the dead
Date: 2022-01-24 08:17:32
Message-ID: 20220124081732.4ravwxbuf42vpzvu@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-01-23 11:29:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Right now, I'm not sure we care; there seems to be more
> enthusiasm for switching to meson. But if that idea falls
> through, we should update to a newer autoconf release.

Depending on the number of portability fixes in those releases the
backbranches could be reason enough to move to a newer autoconf, even if we
get to meson in HEAD? Of course only if there's more things fixed than
broken...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-01-24 08:19:48 Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-01-24 08:11:52 Re: PSA: Autoconf has risen from the dead