Re: Null commitTS bug

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: kingsboa(at)amazon(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Null commitTS bug
Date: 2022-01-17 02:17:24
Message-ID: 20220117.111724.632185256127324915.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:49:59 +0000, "Kingsborough, Alex" <kingsboa(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote in
> The fix for this is very simple
>
>
> /* if we wrote out all subxids, we're done. /
> - if (j + 1 >= nsubxids)
> + if (j >= nsubxids)
> break;

It looks like a thinko and the fix is correct. (It's a matter of taste
choosing between it and "j == nsubxids").

I found some confusing lines around but they need not a fix
considering back-patching conflict?

> for (i = 0, headxid = xid;;)
..
> i += j - i + 1;

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-01-17 03:15:51 Re: Consistently use the function name CreateCheckPoint instead of CreateCheckpoint in code comments
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-17 02:12:36 Re: Add jsonlog log_destination for JSON server logs