| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | buildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: data_checksums coverage |
| Date: | 2022-01-14 05:53:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20220114055312.GN14051@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | buildfarm-members |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 01:50:42PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:18:11AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Is there any coverage with data_checksums=on (initdb -k) ?
>
> The build farm client doesn't support that as far as I can see after a quick
> look at run_build.pl.
>
> There's some coverage in the pg_checksums tool TAP tests, although not a lot.
That's what I thought. I also raised the question on -hackers, so I suspect
we'll address that somehow.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220113193238.xkzsnigg5gri5lwl%40alap3.anarazel.de
Thanks,
--
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-01-21 18:28:45 | Re: Buildfarm update to Python 3 needed |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-01-14 05:50:42 | Re: data_checksums coverage |