| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) |
| Date: | 2022-01-11 11:23:41 |
| Message-ID: | 202201111123.2jgx5lnzecdf@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Jan-11, Amit Langote wrote:
> As for the fix to make cross-partition updates work correctly with
> foreign keys, I just realized it won't work for the users' existing
> foreign keys, because the parent table's triggers that are needed for
> the fix to work would not be present. Were you thinking that we'd ask
> users of v13 and v14 to drop and recreate those constraints?
Yeah, more or less. Also, any tables created from 13.6 onwards.
I was mainly thinking that we'll still have people creating new clusters
using pg13 for half a decade.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a rumor that
you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise.
It's worth the effort. Recommended." (Gerry Pourwelle)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Denis Hirn | 2022-01-11 11:33:17 | Re: [PATCH] Allow multiple recursive self-references |
| Previous Message | RKN Sai Krishna | 2022-01-11 11:18:59 | Query regarding replication slots |