| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade verbosity when redirecting output to log file |
| Date: | 2022-01-10 06:39:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20220110063958.uzv564eq3qrli56m@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-01-10 01:14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Fun! That seems to me to be a strong argument for not letting
> the behavior vary depending on isatty().
Yea.
> I think I'd vote for just nuking that output altogether.
> It seems of very dubious value.
It seems worthwhile in some form - on large cluster in copy mode, the "Copying
user relation files" step can take *quite* a while, and even link/clone mode
aren't fast. But perhaps what'd be really needed is something counting up
actual progress in percentage of files and/or space...
I think just coupling it to verbose mode makes the most sense, for now?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2022-01-10 07:00:00 | Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky? |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-01-10 06:37:25 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |