Re: Some clean-up work in get_cheapest_group_keys_order()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Some clean-up work in get_cheapest_group_keys_order()
Date: 2022-07-13 01:12:06
Message-ID: 2021337.1657674726@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 11:02, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Agreed, but I think there are other instances of that idiom that
>> should be cleaned up while you're at it.

> Agreed. I imagine we should just do the remaining cleanup in master
> only. Do you agree?

No objection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-07-13 01:35:24 Re: DropRelFileLocatorBuffers
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-13 01:02:27 Re: test_oat_hooks bug (was: Re: pgsql: Add copy/equal support for XID lists)