Re: Adding CI to our tree

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: 2021-12-31 02:28:46
Message-ID: 20211231022846.GU24477@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

commit message: agithub

the the the buildfarm.
=> the

access too.
=> to

# Due to that it using concurrency within prove is helpful.
=> Due to that, it's useful to run prove with multiple jobs.

further details src/tools/ci/README
=> further details , see src/tools/ci/README

script uses a pseudo-tty, which do support locking.
=> which does

To limit unneccessary work only run this once normal linux test succeeded
=> unnecessary
=> succeeds

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-12-31 03:03:51 Re: Adding CI to our tree
Previous Message Amit Langote 2021-12-31 02:26:11 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning