| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |
| Date: | 2021-12-29 19:41:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20211229194142.a2pt4o4jqv6cmzrx@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2021-12-29 17:29:52 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > FWIW I don't think we include updates to typedefs.list in patches.
>
> Seems pretty harmless? And useful to keep around in development
> branches because I like to pgindent stuff...
I think it's even helpful. As long as it's done with a bit of manual
oversight, I don't see a meaningful downside of doing so. One needs to be
careful to not remove platform dependant typedefs, but that's it. And
especially for long-lived feature branches it's much less work to keep the
typedefs.list changes in the tree, rather than coming up with them locally
over and over / across multiple people working on a branch.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-12-29 20:17:37 | Re: Adding CI to our tree |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-12-29 19:39:31 | Re: Throttling WAL inserts when the standby falls behind more than the configured replica_lag_in_bytes |