| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
| Date: | 2021-12-16 04:08:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20211216040807.GY17618@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:18:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Anyway, it seems like there's some consensus that 9.2 is a good
> > stopping place for today. I'll push forward with
> > (1) back-patching as necessary to make 9.2 and up build cleanly
> > on the platforms I have handy;
> > (2) ripping out pg_dump's support for pre-9.2 servers;
> > (3) ripping out psql's support for pre-9.2 servers.
>
> I've completed the pg_dump/pg_dumpall part of that, but while
Is it possible to clean up pg_upgrade, too ?
--
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2021-12-16 04:22:22 | Re: [PATCH] Document heuristics for parameterized paths |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2021-12-16 03:03:11 | Re: COPY IN/BOTH vs. extended query mode |