From: | "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Difference in execution plans pg12 vs pg14 |
Date: | 2021-12-11 11:18:18 |
Message-ID: | 20211211111818.7h3o5zbywhfjzvgf@hjp.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2021-12-11 06:00:40 +0500, Дмитрий Иванов wrote:
> Afternoon. I was able to make the necessary changes to my base needed to
> migrate win_pg12 to debian pg14.
> But there is a new problem, which was not there at the initial stage so I
> checked:
>
> win_pg12:
> -> Index Scan using index_class_tree_full on class c (cost=0.28..2.50 rows=1
> width=235) (actual time=0.030..0.032 rows=1 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (id = 650)
> debian_pg14:
> -> Index Scan using index_class_tree_full on class c (cost=0.28..2.50 rows=1
> width=235) (actual time=842.795..842.796 rows=1 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (id = 650)
Is this repeatable or did it just occur once?
32 µs to retrieve a single row via index probably means that it was
already cached in RAM
842796 µs to retrieve a single row via index doesn't even look realistic
for a completely cold database on a slow rotating hard disk. If this
happened only once I suspect that something else interfered (maybe
another I/O intensive process, if this is on a VM maybe even on another
guest). If it is repeatable, something very weird is going on.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Дмитрий Иванов | 2021-12-11 12:56:16 | Re: Difference in execution plans pg12 vs pg14 |
Previous Message | Дмитрий Иванов | 2021-12-11 09:32:01 | Re: Difference in execution plans pg12 vs pg14 |