From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Check that we have a working tar before trying to use it |
Date: | 2021-12-09 02:16:04 |
Message-ID: | 20211209021604.bv5tfr23ymh4u7x4@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Hi,
On 2021-12-08 12:53:29 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It would have passed the test and failed the invocation as before. It
> turns out that the tar being used is from the (old) MsysGit
> installation. So I'm rearranging the path so it finds the system tar
> instead. That should take care of things. (testing first before I do
> anything else). On my initial test the system tar handled paths with
> drive specs just fine.
I just hit this issue. The tar included in a just-updated git-for-windows
fails with "tar: Cannot connect to c: resolve failed".
Git appears to install itself in front of c:\windows\system32 in PATH (which
contains the system tar). Which I think means that after edc2332550 this will
have to be manually addressed by most people running tests on windows
manually? That doesn't seem great :(
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-12-09 02:18:54 | Re: pgsql: Check that we have a working tar before trying to use it |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-12-09 01:25:52 | pgsql: Standardize cleanup lock terminology. |