From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | yinan81(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ssl_crl_file Certificate Revocation List doesn't work for postgresql 11 |
Date: | 2021-12-02 04:46:19 |
Message-ID: | 20211202.134619.1052008069537649171.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi.
At Thu, 2 Dec 2021 11:31:26 +0800, Yi Sun <yinan81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Hi Kyotaro
>
> From the description, seems ~/.postgresql/root.crl is store client
> revoked certificate
No. Revocation is checked on the peer. There's no point for a server
to check for revocation of its own certificate, and actually that
doesn't happen. Revocation of a client certificate is checked on
server side referencing server.crl. Revocation of a server certificate
is checked on client side referencing postgresql.crl. For example,
some web browsers make use of CRL of web *servers*, which is
automatically maintained in background.
You will see it work if you duped the server.crl as
~/.postgresql/root.crl on the client. (I spelled this wrongly in the
previous message..)
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/libpq-ssl.html
> ~/.postgresql/root.crl certificates revoked by certificate authorities server
> certificate must not be on this list
> Just don't know why server parameter ssl_crl_file parameter configured but
> don't take affect
As explained above, it is because the CRL specified by ssl_crl_file
can only be used to verify client certificates.
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/runtime-config-connection.html#GUC-SSL-CRL-FILE
>
> ssl_crl_file (string)
>
> Specifies the name of the file containing the SSL server certificate
> revocation list (CRL). Relative paths are relative to the data directory.
> This parameter can only be set in the postgresql.conf file or on the server
> command line. The default is empty, meaning no CRL file is loaded.
Ah, the "server" in "SSL server certificate revocation list" looks
like a noise word, rather misleading, or plain wrong, I'm not sure
which one it actually is.
Anyway I propose change the rephrase as "SSL client certification
revocation list" as attached.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix_crl_doc.patch | text/x-patch | 2.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2021-12-02 05:22:29 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT doesn't work |
Previous Message | Michael Lewis | 2021-12-02 04:20:56 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT doesn't work |