Re: Deprecating the term "super-exclusive lock"

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deprecating the term "super-exclusive lock"
Date: 2021-12-01 22:50:45
Message-ID: 20211201225045.5w4ucay7pw2n6s4l@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-11-30 16:21:25 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> In commit 276db875, I made vacuumlazy.c consistently use the term
> "cleanup lock", rather than the term "super-exclusive lock". But on
> further reflection I should have gone further, and removed the term
> "super-exclusive lock" from the tree completely. The actual relevant C
> symbols only use the term cleanup.

+1

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-12-01 22:52:43 Re: pg_replslotdata - a tool for displaying replication slot information
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-12-01 22:14:03 Re: BUG #17302: gist index prevents insertion of some data