| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows build warnings |
| Date: | 2021-11-23 14:41:23 |
| Message-ID: | 202111231441.2avyfcys3ibd@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Nov-23, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 2:11 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > It's supported in clang as well per the documentation [0] in at least some
> > configurations or distributions:
> [[maybe_unused]] is also recognized from Visual Studio 2017 onwards [1].
>
> [1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/attributes?view=msvc-170
Right ... the problem, as I understand, is that the syntax for
[[maybe_unused]] is different from what we can do with the current
pg_attribute_unused -- [[maybe_unused]] goes before the variable name.
We would need to define pg_attribute_unused macro (maybe have it take
the variable name and initializator value as arguments?), and also
define PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY in the same style.
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-11-23 14:41:36 | Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else? |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-11-23 14:12:45 | Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend |