Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
Date: 2021-11-18 20:42:57
Message-ID: 20211118204257.nbp6dh6zt5rvpees@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-11-18 12:43:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah. I'm inclined to think we ought to just bite the bullet and fold
> CLANG/CLANGXX into the main list of compiler switch probes, so that we
> check every interesting one four times. That sounds fairly horrid,
> but as long as you are using an accache file it's not really going
> to cost that much. (BTW, does meson have any comparable optimization?
> If it doesn't, I bet that is going to be a problem.)
>
> regards, tom lane
Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-11-18 20:44:37 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-18 20:22:41 Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else?