| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Fix headerscheck failure in replication/worker_internal.h |
| Date: | 2021-11-16 17:33:46 |
| Message-ID: | 202111161733.y6r2myylxrj5@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Nov-16, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Short answer is yes, inclusion of be-gssapi-common.h is typically
> wrapped in a #ifdef, see src/backend/libpq/auth.c
It'd be as in the attached, then.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Harden-gssapi.h-inclusion-for-headerscheck.patch | text/x-diff | 948 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-11-16 17:47:59 | Re: pgsql: Fix headerscheck failure in replication/worker_internal.h |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-11-16 17:14:31 | Re: pgsql: Fix headerscheck failure in replication/worker_internal.h |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniil Zakhlystov | 2021-11-16 17:40:47 | Re: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 2 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-11-16 17:14:31 | Re: pgsql: Fix headerscheck failure in replication/worker_internal.h |